“Wyoming is rich in natural resources, including eagles and strong winds,” said U.S. Attorney L. Robert Murray of Wyoming County. “Today`s verdict demonstrates our commitment to the conservation and sustainable use of our resources. It also ensures a level playing field for Wyoming businesses and ensures that those that receive federal tax credits comply with federal law. “216B.1691, 700 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005) (Challenge of Meeting Renewable Energy Targets) Text Ecogen Wind v.
Town of Prattsburgh Town Vol., 978 N.Y.S.2d 485 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 2013) Text San Isabel Electric Ass`n, Inc. v. Pub. Utilities Comm., 487 pp.3d 665 (Colo. 2021) (The electricity supplier could power its wind farm in the rural co-op`s electricity supply area itself) Text Trude v.
City Vol. de Cohocton, 851 N.Y.S.2d 61 (Table) (N.Y. Sup. ct. 2007) (action to repeal municipal by-laws governing wind farms) Text Ctr. for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc., 166 Cal.App.4th 1349 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) (Violation of public trust by authorizing wind farm) Text Oneida Seven Generations Corp. v.
City of Green Bay, 865 N.W.2d 162 (Wisconsin 2015) (City Decision to Revoke Renewable Energy Facility`s Conditional Use Permit) Text In re Green Mountain Power Co. , 60 A.3d 654 (Vt. 2012) Text Gamesa Eolica, S.A. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 359 F.Supp.2d 790 (W.D. Wis.
2005) (Variable Speed Wind Turbine Patent Litigation) Text In re LK Holdings, LLC, 201 A.3d 373 (Vt. 2018) (Challenging the rejection of the application for a certificate of public interest for the construction of a solar power plant) Text Siete Solar, LLC v. Arizona Dept. of Revenue, 435 p.3d 1052 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019) (Challenge to decision on assessment of renewable energy facilities) Text S. Cal.
Edison Co. v. Util. Comm`n, 121 Cal.App.4th 1303, 18 Cal.Rptr.3d 435 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Text In re Programmatic Changes, 175 A.3d 509 (Vt. 2017) Text In re Programmatic Changes, 175 A 509 (Vt. 2017) Text Midland Power Co-op. v.
Swecker, 09-1218, 2010 WL 2598291 (Iowa Ct. 30. June 2010) (no agricultural liens from the sale of wind power) Text “Shelf law seems to come into play when you`re talking about something attached to the ground, as opposed to a floating ship,” said Paul Morico, chair of the Energy IP practice group at Baker Botts LLP in Houston. FairwindCT, Inc. v Connecticut Sitting Council, 99 A.3d 1038 (Conn. 2014) Text Ctr. for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc., 2006 WL 2987634 (Cal. Super. Ct. 2006) (Wind Turbines and Birds) Karr v.
Va. Dept. of Environmental Quality, 789 S.E.2d 121 (Va. Ct. App. 2016) (stringent regulations affecting the construction and operation of small wind projects) Text Global competition among major equipment manufacturers has increased, while some traditional oil and gas companies want to explore clean energy projects and use their extraction experience to find a role in the fossil fuel transition. Invenergy sought summary judgment dismissing the claims. Grain Belt Express Clean Line, LLC v Public Service Commission, 555 S.W.3d 469 (Mo. 2018) (challenging the denial of the application for a transmission line that would carry wind power) Text In re Investigation Into Standard-Offer Program, 191 A.3d 113 (Vt. 2018) (Review of Public Utility Commission Order Amending Technology Allocations under Standard Tendering Program for Renewable Energy Projects) Text relating to Broad Mountain Development Co., LLC, 17 A.3d 434 (Pa.
Commw. Eth 2011) (Challenging the Revocation of Building Permit for the Development of a Wind Turbine Project) Text Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v Perennial Solar, LLC, 212 A.3d 868 (Ct. Comp. 2019) Text N. Ill. Chapter of Assoc. Builders & Contractors, Inc. v Lavin, 431 F.3d 1004 (7th Cir. 2005) (State subsidizes construction of renewable energy facilities and requires builders to enter into employment contracts) Text Dunmoyer v. Wells County, Indiana Area Plan Commission, 32 N.E.3d 785 (Ind. Ct.
App. 2015) (Challenge to permit to develop a large wind farm) Text Nexus Technologies, Inc. v Unlimited Power Ltd., No. 1:19-cv-00009-MR, 2019 WL 2884345 (W.D. North Carolina 7. October 2019) (patent question related to solar-powered portable renewable energy systems) Text He did not say what should happen next to the plants, but a lawyer representing the herdsmen said the decision meant all 151 wind turbines would have to be dismantled. In 2003, ESI approved a subsidiary, FPL Energy New Mexico Wind LLC (NMW), to commission a commercial wind turbine in De Baca and Quay counties, New Mexico. On or about December 29, 2020, two golden eagle carcasses were found near a wind turbine near the NMW. The Nevada Supreme Court upheld the standing order.
The court considered the conditions for establishing harassment. Harassment is something “that is harmful to health or indecent and offensive to the senses, or an obstacle to the free use of property to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life and property.” There are different types of harassment; A “judicial nuisance” is a nuisance that is always classified as harassment, while a “nuisance indeed” is a nuisance that becomes a nuisance depending on the circumstances and the case-by-case analysis of the facts. Piccolella v. Lycoming County Zoning Hearing Vol., 984 A.2d 1046 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009) (Zoning Order Authorizing Wind Farms) Text Until last year, the law applied to facilities or equipment that were attached to the seabed in order to “explore, develop or produce resources thereof.” The language has been awkwardly applied to wind projects, lawyers say, raising the question of whether patent law would follow offshore turbines. Desert Protective Council gegen U.S. Dept.
of the Interior, 927 F.Supp.2d 949 (S.D. Cal. 2013) (Klage gegen die Genehmigung des Windkraftprojekts im Versorgungsmaßstab) Text Woods v. Fayette County Zoning Board of Adjustment, 913 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018) Text Allco Finance Limited v. Klee, 861 F.3d 82 (2nd Cir. 2017) (Challenging the requirement that utilities produce renewable energy themselves or purchase renewable energy credits) Text Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (Action Against Approval of Offshore Wind Energy Project) Text Gilberton Power Co.